翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Reno Renegades ・ Reno Riggins ・ Reno Rules ・ Reno Rumble ・ Reno Rumble (season 1) ・ Reno Sharpshooters ・ Reno Silver Sox ・ Reno Silver Sox (Golden Baseball League) ・ Reno Stead Airport ・ Reno Thomas ・ Reno Township ・ Reno Township, Michigan ・ Reno Township, Pope County, Minnesota ・ Reno USL team ・ Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union ・ Reno v. Condon ・ Reno v. Flores ・ Reno W. Trego ・ Reno Wilson ・ Reno, Alberta ・ Reno, Illinois ・ Reno, Indiana ・ Reno, Kansas ・ Reno, Lamar County, Texas ・ Reno, Michigan ・ Reno, Minnesota ・ Reno, Nevada ・ Reno, Ohio ・ Reno, Parker County, Texas ・ Reno, Texas Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Reno v. Condon ： ウィキペディア英語版 Reno v. Condon ''Reno v. Condon'', 528 U.S. 141 (2000), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States upheld the Driver's Privacy Protection Act of 1994 (DPPA) against a Tenth Amendment challenge. ==Facts and procedural history== State departments of motor vehicles (DMVs) They(the DMV)require drivers and automobile owners to provide personal information, which may include a person's name, address, telephone number, vehicle description, Social Security number, medical information, and photograph, as a condition of obtaining a driver's license or registering an automobile. Finding that many States sell this information to individuals and businesses (particularly direct marketing and auto insurance companies) for significant revenues, and to prevent stalkers from tracking their victims across state lines,〔(Brief for the Petitioners, Reno v. Condon, 528 U.S. 141 (2000), No. 98-1464 ), at 5〕 Congress enacted the Driver's Privacy Protection Act of 1994, , which established a regulatory scheme to restrict the States' ability to disclose a driver's personal information without the driver's consent. South Carolina, represented by South Carolina attorney general Charlie Condon, filed suit, alleging that the DPPA violates the Tenth and Eleventh Amendments to the United States Constitution. Concluding that the DPPA is incompatible with the principles of federalism inherent in the Constitution's division of power between the States and the Federal Government, the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina granted summary judgment for the State and permanently enjoined the DPPA's enforcement against the State and its officers, and United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed.〔quoting from text of decision syllabus.〕 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Reno v. Condon」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.